Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I'm embarrassed': Paul Gustard's damning verdict after Harlequins' first-half no-show at Worcester

By Online Editors
(Photo by Shaun Botterill/Getty Images)

The bus journey home to London from Worcester must have been uncomfortable for Harlequins players following their public dressing down by coach Paul Gustard in the wake of their 29-14 Gallagher Premiership defeat at Sixways. Harlequins would have resumed the league post-lockdown with hopes of working their way into the end-of-season play-off picture, an ambition further stoked by their restart win over Sale at The Stoop. 

ADVERTISEMENT

However, brittleness on the road has since undermined them, Gustard’s team following up last Saturday’s  38-24 defeat at London rivals Saracens with a first-half no-show at Worcester where they conceded 26 unanswered points. 

The ramifications of the defeats are obvious on the Premiership table – Harlequins are cut adrift in seventh place, their 32-point haul well short of Bath on 44 who currently occupy the fourth and final play-off spot.     

Video Spacer

England forward Courtney Lawes guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Video Spacer

England forward Courtney Lawes guests on The Lockdown, the RugbyPass pandemic interview series

Harlequins are back in action on Sunday when they host Northampton, another team whose post-lockdown results haven’t been impressive, and it will be interesting to see if the stinging words from Gustard in the wake of Worcester get the necessary reaction from his players.

Following the defeat the ex-England assistant let loose, saying: “I’m embarrassed. We never saw that coming. That’s not to say we are an arrogant team and we think that we are going to dominate teams physically.

“But the team that we picked, we didn’t think we picked people that were going to get steamrollered, but that’s exactly what happened. Our general play in the first half, we got bullied when we carried the ball.

“We lost 25 per cent of our lineout ball, and the story of the game was that we never got a foothold in it because we didn’t control any territory. If you can’t function in the set-piece in rugby, it is a very tough game to play.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Everyone is hurting. That first 40 minutes is one of the lowest points of my coaching career. We never got to fire a shot, we were on the back foot all the time. It was a sobering 40 minutes for sure.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 'You lied. You're a ***king liar' - Rassie Erasmus' x-rated Bok rant 'You lied. You're a ****king liar' - Rassie Erasmus' x-rated Bok rant
Search