Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Crowdless Eden Park could cede North v South match to Wellington

By Online Editors
(Photo by Elias Rodriguez/Getty Images)

Wellington is in the box seat to host the North versus South match after the Government denied exemptions for Auckland-based players and staff to travel next week.

ADVERTISEMENT

With another $1 million in gate takings at stake, New Zealand Rugby is on tenterhooks as it awaits the Government’s next Covid-19 update on Monday.

Having made the decision to postpone the North against South fixture by one week – from August 29 to September 5 – Monday’s announcement will now determine whether the match is staged in Auckland as originally planned or moved to the capital.

Video Spacer

All the very finest fan moments of Super Rugby Aotearoa | Sam Smith Reports

Video Spacer

All the very finest fan moments of Super Rugby Aotearoa | Sam Smith Reports

While a range of scenarios remain in play, NZR head of professional rugby Chris Lendrum said the match would be cancelled if it could not be played on September 5.

“There is an alternative here where we cannot play the game but we remain really hopeful that can happen. At this stage we don’t think we can push past September 5 or that weekend because we’ve got Mitre 10 Cup due to start the following weekend.

“There is a scenario where the game could be played without crowds at Level 2, but it is going to depend on the position of the entire country in all likelihood.

“So, no, we don’t have a decision on a venue. We will see what Monday brings, when the Government revises or extends the current levels.”

ADVERTISEMENT

With Auckland seemingly unlikely to jump from alert Level 3 to 1 next week, Wellington appears a more realistic option of hosting the match with crowds permitted to attend.

New Zealand Rugby and the Blues lost $1 million in gate takings from cancelling the final Super Rugby Aotearoa match against the Crusaders at a sold out Eden Park, and Lendrum confirmed a comparable pot was on the line for the North and South fixture.

“It’s around a similar sort of figure. We’re talking about a sold out Eden Park, at relatively accessible ticketing prices. Wellington is a smaller venue so there would be a smaller yield from ticketing but by far the greater cost is to not have the game at all.”

NZR failed in its attempt to gain exemptions for the 14 Auckland-based players and five support staff to travel to Wellington and assemble with the squads on Monday – Health Minister Chris Hipkins initially saying he had not received any exemption requests – and there is no expectation that situation will change.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We submitted the exemptions early in the week it goes into the same process that any other individual or business goes into. I’m not sure whether he had seen it at the time he spoke or not.

“Our understanding is the threshold for exemption is really high. The exemptions are only really for life-threatening circumstances.

“We haven’t met the threshold which is frustrating for everyone involved in the game and the fans, but we totally accept the decision.

“We are not frustrated at the decision. We are just frustrated we can’t play the game – yet.”

Lendrum confirmed if NZ Rugby is unable to get players and management released from Auckland that will force the game to be cancelled.

“The thinking this week is that wouldn’t be the right thing to do. It wouldn’t do justice to the fixture, it wouldn’t be the preference of the people participating or the fans.

“We have taken the decision that is preferable to delay, rather than consider that option.”

Postponing the North against South match is expected to have a knock-on effect for the availability of All Blacks and leading Super Rugby players involved in the fixture. Injuries and fatigue are likely, and some players face the prospect of a six-day turnaround for the opening Mitre 10 Cup match between North Harbour and Canterbury on September 11.

“We’ll have to put a player-by-player lens across this but as a general rule we expect all our players to be available for round one of Mitre 10. Every week we lose to Covid we condense a bit harder up against the end of the year. All of these things we’re taking day by day, week by week.”

Despite the ongoing uncertainty Lendrum remains positive about New Zealand hosting the Rugby Championship from November 7 to December 12.

The All Blacks’ first match of the year, against a Moana Pacific side at Mt Smart Stadium on October 3, is expected to be confirmed next week.

“Every day, every week, things fluctuate. There’s always been risk around Bledisloe Cup and Rugby Championship being able to be played. Right now we remain really confident – we don’t have to make those decisions today fortunately we’ve got time so we’ll keep a watching brief.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 5 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

4 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 12 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Leinster set for 'hugely exciting' stadium move next season Leinster set for 'hugely exciting' stadium move next season
Search