Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Beaumont represents 'safer pair of hands' - Ex-Ireland star weighs in on election battle

By Online Editors
Former Munster player Alan Quinlan.

Former Munster and Ireland back-row Alan Quinlan believes there is little to pick between Bill Beaumont and Gus Pichot as the two battle it out for the position of World Rugby Chairman.

ADVERTISEMENT

Unions are currently voting on the position, with the result due to be announced on Tuesday May 12.

Beaumont has held the role since 2016, but faces stiff competition from former Argentina international Pichot, who has outlined a number of ambitious ideas that he believes will bring the game forward and expand it on a global scale.

Video Spacer

Players could lose 20kg muscle

Video Spacer

Players could lose 20kg muscle

Quinlan, who represented Munster over 200 times, believes there has not been enough detail in either candidate’s bid, but that overall Beaumont represents “a safer pair of hands” as Unions consider the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.

“The current pandemic will probably awaken a lot of unions, particularly in the northern hemisphere, as to their financial positions and the lack of potential investment and financial growth a Nations League could generate,” Quinlan told Off the Ball.

“We’ve had this discussion before about Italy’s participation in the Six Nations, should there be relegation there… it’s driven by finances and I think this will be a big wake-up call for the unions about the possibility.

“There’s not a lot of difference in both manifestos from Gus Pichot and Bill Beaumont, so it’s hard to look at each manifesto and say, ‘well, I’m going to vote for one or the other’. They’re quite similar. Player welfare is a big part of it, the global season, the Nations League, all that kind of stuff.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think Bill Beaumont is probably a safer pair of hands… Gus Pichot is certainly going to bring a huge amount of enthusiasm and vision, but it’s quite difficult to decipher from both of their bids who is going to do what different.”

Regardless of the result, Quinlan believes there will be some major changes introduced over the next few years.

“I think we’re going to see some change in the global game,” he said.

“Both of their manifestos talk a lot about change and the need for change – it’s a kind of north versus south scenario. The northern hemisphere are backing Bill Beaumont, the southern hemisphere are backing Agustín Pichot.

“There is this perception about rugby that it’s run by older people with very set mindsets who want to keep that control. If he wants to get and garner support… he’s got to make sure he lets people have their voices and their opinions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“That’s what Pichot has done, he’s been really open about how he wants more equality right across the game. Hopefully we will see some change in a positive way.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 6 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers Charlie Cale may be the answer to Joe Schmidt's back-row prayers
Search